As
the demand for library e-books
increases one of
the most pressing concerns among librarians is how to lend
e-books and whether it will be possible to make them available within
existing budgets. In parts of the library community there is an
expectation that ebooks will be inexpensive for libraries, and there is
a demand for business models that give libraries the opportunity to
give unlimited access to ebooks. This article will try to show why
this is unlikely to happen and to point to more realistic scenarios for
e-book lending.
Possibilities
and challenges for libraries
The
introduction of e-books will have profound implications for libraries
and for public libraries in particular. The yearly overviews of
it-trends published by the consultancy company, Gartner Group, are
called hype cycles based on
the experience that there is a tendency to overestimate
the short-term effect of new technologies. The cycles do, however, also
incorporate a corresponding tendency: that we tend to underestimate the
long-term effect of new
technologies. This could very well be the case with e-books.
E-books will challenge public libraries in many ways.
The primary reason for visiting a public library is still to check out
books. Therefore e-books could increase
the possibility of library bypass. E-books are, however, first and
foremost an exciting new possibility for libraries to serve the public
in new and better ways. They can be used in new ways to promote
reading, the joy of literature and to support lifelong learning. They
can also help libraries
reach new user groups that do not visit the physical library.
The e-books could also potentially be a means of saving money for the
individual library. If e-book titles replace
physical copies libraries could save money on the storing and handling
of physical materials. Such savings will require a deliberate choice to
prioritise digital content as there is likely to be a continued demand
for the physical book.
Most users are quite conservative in their media habits and new media
forms often supplement existing media forms rather than replace them.
The possibility for libraries to use ebooks to provide new services to
patrons or as a means to save money will of course depend on the cost
of ebooks
and the conditions for making them available. There are unfortunately
two very important constraints on the way libraries can make e-books
available: copyright legislation and the commercial interests of
publishers and authors.
Copyright
legislation
The
cornerstone of international copyright is the author’s
ownership to his work and the exclusive right to decide
how to make it available to the public. The legal protection of the
author’s right to his work establishes an incentive
to create new works in the expectation of subsequent sale of these
works in a market. The prohibition of unauthorized
copying creates a market for the work and enables
the author to receive revenue that is proportionate to
the effort put into creating the work. The underlying presumption is
that without the copyright protection
the works created would be fewer and of lesser quality.
In most countries there is an exemption in the copyright legislation
allowing libraries to buy a copy of a physical book and lend this copy
to the public without restrictions. This exemption does not exist for
digital copies and so libraries have no special status when it comes to
e-books. This means that libraries have to have permission from
the rights holder to make e-books available. Libraries have to
negotiate a contract and obtain a license to lend e-books.
This situation has prompted some members of the library community to
advocate for changes in the copyright
legislation that would give libraries the same special copyright
exemptions for loans of e-books as they have for
physical books.While some modification of copyright legislation could
be both valuable for libraries as well as
realistic it is highly unlikely that loans of e-books could be covered
by the same exemptions that apply to physical
books. The reason is that such a step would undermine
the sale of e-books to private individuals.
The sale of physical books in Denmark totals more
than
500 million Euros a year and the
sale to the public libraries
is less than 30 million Euros a year. If the Danish publishers
converted the whole portfolio of physical books to ebooks
without any restrictions on library loans they would risk losing their
entire revenue from sale to private individuals, companies and
institutions. There would also be less money to pay authors and
establish an incentive to produce new works.
The publishers might therefore prefer to have no or very restricted
e-book loans. There is, however, in most countries a political demand,
that it should be possible for libraries to lend out ebooks. The
challenge is therefore to
find business models that enable libraries to lend out e-books while
not undermining the commercial to private
individuals.
E-book
business models
There
are at least three basic models for e-book loans: access-based (e.g.
flat rate), usage-based (payment pr. loan), ownership (payment pr.
copy) that can be combined in numerous ways. In addition to these
models there are
different freemium models that are outside the scope of this article.
With access-based models the library pays for access to an e-book
collection. If it is a flat rate model the library will
pay the same amount independently of how many e-books are borrowed. For
public libraries this model will only work with a short loan period or
a limit on renewals as it will otherwise undermine sales.
Usage-based models have the advantage of larger payments to the
publisher as usage increases, thereby compensating for potential
corresponding decrease in sales. In some models the library will pay a
smaller unit price pr. loan as the number of loans increase, thereby
giving the library a larger incentive to promote e-books.
The model is also dependent on a short loan period
or
a limit on renewals.
The ownership model has been made famous by the American e-book
distributor, Overdrive. The library
buys
a digital copy of the work and ‘owns’ this copy. It
is treated exactly like a physical copy of a book and is subject
to
the same scarcity. The library only has the number of digital copies it
has purchased, and the user can therefore
experience reservation queues.
The latter model has been quite successful in the US possibly because
publishers feel more comfortable with
a model that resembles the traditional arrangement.
There is a lot of controversy about Overdrive because
the publisher Harper Collins imposed a cap on the number of loans of
its books through Overdrive (26 loans), and because Overdrive in
September did a deal with Amazon to deliver library e-books on Kindle
without notifying
the libraries. Although the model has met with some opposition in the
library community it could be a good transitional model and support the
digitisation of earlier works. Both the Internet Archive and
initiatives such as Gluejar work with this model.
The
choice of model for library e-book
loans
The
choice of the right model depends on the behaviour of the users. It
cannot be determined in advance whether
a given model will strike the right balance between sales and loans.
This balance could prove even more delicate
for smaller language areas where library loans can have
a stronger impact on sales.
In November 2011 a consortium of Danish public libraries will launch an
initiative with lending of new e-books from Danish publishers. The
initiative is a trial and the resul of close collaboration
with some of the larger Danish
publishers. The initiative relies on a usage-based payment model. In
addition to the libraries’ experiences it will be important
to study both how the users receive the new library offer and how the
publishers combine the library
model with the sale to private individuals. Such initiatives are
important steps in identifying the relevant model for
library loans of e-books. It is not unlikely that we will end up with a
combination of the different models or with different models for
different
types of e-books.