When Danish public libraries in the
mid-eighties started offering access to
computers, children were very eager to
come and use them. Boys literally
fought to get a seat in front of the
screen.Many soon followed the
example of the front running libraries,
and computers in children’s libraries
became an absolute hit. In the period
from late eighties and till mid-nineties
official library statistics show a marked
growth in children’s use of libraries.
But from the second half of the nineties
and to the present day, we witness
a constant decline. From 1998 to 2004
the group of most frequent library
users among children has halved the
number of visits. The public libraries
in Denmark still have close contact
with 9 out of 10 children, but their
visits are becoming more random. The
most obvious consequence is that the
number of book loans is declining,
while use of other media seems to be
more stable.
Can we find any reasons for this
dramatic change? A possible answer is
that the rise and fall in the number of
users is due to the same cause: Computers.
The rise in the early nineties could
thus be explained by the power of attraction
of computers in the libraries,
and the fall in the new century could
be due to the fact that the majority of
Danish children have access to a
computer, not only in their home, but
even in their own room. An average
Danish child’s room has over the last
years been transformed into a minor
media centre - and many, many children’s
libraries still look as they did
twenty years ago. Did we fail to find
new attractions for the children? Did
we fail - in our own fascination by the
new digital media - to take proper care
of a task of basic importance?
Statistics illustrate very clearly this
development. Children visit libraries
less, read fewer books, even watch
fewer television programmes. On the
other hand they spend the time saved
using the Internet more and playing yet
more computer games.
Is this a problem? Maybe not. You may
argue that we are talking of modern
edutainment and the smart kids certainly
learn a lot. But a growing number
of less smart kids are becoming losers.
When leaving school after nine years
they are not able to read well and some
of them not at all. The number of
functional illiterates is growing. Different
surveys of teenagers show somewhat
different figures, but the figures
are always high. It is one out of four or
one out of five or six who are not able
to read easily and fluently, depending
on the area and the method used in the
survey.
The ability to read is a necessary cultural
competence.Without good
reading skills your position on the job
market will be a lousy one, and you
will lose control over your life. A huge
number of fellow citizens in that position
is a disgrace for a wealthy society
and the risk of social tensions is
evident.
One of the reasons for the unhappy
situation is that children read less. You
will never ever become a good reader if
you only read what you must read in
school. So the work that libraries,
teachers and parents do to encourage
and inspire children to read books is
more important than ever.
So let’s face the challenge: Children
must become better readers, and book
reading is the safest way.We must continue
to run campaigns and reading
contests, tell stories, read aloud, establish
writing workshops and many other
well-known activities that truly support
reading. But we must also invent
new activities and services.We must
create the children’s library of the 21.
century, and it should be different from
that of the age of industrialism.We
don’t know in detail how it will develop,
we need many more experiments
and projects, but I see two particularly
exciting challenges. One is to change
the traditional library space into an
interactive playing-learning-knowledge
space. How can this be done? We are
dealing with that question. The other is
to concentrate much more intensively
on the user’s needs. This means that
the librarian must invest much more
energy outside the library space - in
clubs, in schools, in youth centres. It is
not an easy job, but it is necessary.