Jorge Luis Borges wrote about “the
universe which others call the Library”,
composed by an infinite number of
hexagonal galleries. This “Library of
Babel” seems to represent the ultimate
systematic order even when duplicated
by those dubious mirrors, but one can
feel the threat in the air - it can all
change into chaos any minute; “the
vertical wilderness of books runs the
incessant risk of changing into others
that affirm, deny, and confuse everything
like a delirious God”.
One can find some exciting architectonic
visions of this mythological
library on the web.
In the previous issue of SPLQ there
were inspiring articles about library
architecture, about planning physical
environments for users, collections and
services, offering, in the hybrid library
era, also access and services virtually,
far beyond the limits of these beautiful
buildings. Today the word space is
frequently mentioned in connection
with libraries, they are public places
offering people personal space. This
implies freedom from demands of any
kind in an environment filled with
possibilities, distinguishing libraries
from shopping malls or entertainment
centres.
I had the opportunity of listening to
Naomi Klein at the ALA/CLA Annual
Conference in Toronto in June this
year. Referring to those more or less
concealed Gats-negotiations she
strongly urged libraries to stay distinctly
public. If we have libraries selling
books and souvenirs and bookshops
with story-telling hours for children
and nice reading corners, people soon
can’t tell the difference between public
and commercial. Then one day we risk
having a situation where booksellers
sue libraries for unfair competition, for
lending for free what they trade, and
no one stands up to defend libraries
because there really is no big difference.
But back to the vertical wilderness
Borges mentions, affirming, denying
and confusing, the universe which
others call the Internet. Never has it
been so easy to produce and distribute
so much disinformation, so many
unwanted messages, such devastating
quantities of futile infotainment all
over the world. On the other hand -
never has it been so easy to inform and
get informed, to keep in contact - vertically
- with like-minded, to follow politics
and science, to discover for oneself
or participate in distance learning.
Libraries lay down hexagon after hexagon
into this virtual space; meta search,
portals, subject guides and catalogues.
According to Finnish Library Strategy
2010 libraries should add value to information
retrieval and management
through services that are critical of
media and sources. The right and
ability to make use of information is a
basic value of the information society,
and libraries should be gateways also to
electronic communication with the
public administration. Libraries are
creators and supporters of community
spirit, they are open for everyone and
strengthen democracy.
Paul Virilio says that McLuhan’s Global
Village is nothing but a “World Ghetto”
as, from his point of view, globalisation
obscures people’s sense of national
identity, rights and democracy. For a
librarian and a civil servant working
with implementing a library strategy
for the future and annually reading
through hundreds of innovative applications
from Finnish libraries for
producing user-friendly services and
contents on the web, the importance of
being distinctly public becomes very
clear, as do the reasons why societies
based on democratic principles and
transparency should truly invest in
their libraries.
A library utilisation rate of 80% of the
Finnish population, meaning real visits
in real library buildings besides the
rapidly growing use of remote services,
makes one feel very optimistic. Libraries
are built to be social and cultural
centres of the civilised information
society.