Several more years must pass before the
population of Oslo will be able to take into
use their new library. Preparations, however,
are well under way and Igal Voronel,
the project manager, has set his sights
high.
The new library will have an excellent
location on the site of the old Oslo
West railway station in an attractive
part of the city centre. The plan is for
the library to share premises with the
Stenersen Museum, one of the Oslo
municipality’s finest art collections.
The earliest possible completion date is
2007 but construction is likely to take
much longer, probably until 2011. No
formal resolution to build has yet been
passed, but the result of an architectural
competition has been announced.
The winning entry was submitted by
OMA, Office for Metropolitan Architecture,
from the Netherlands. OMA is
also responsible for the new public
library now under construction in
Seattle.
Igal Voronel is well satisfied with the
result of the architectural competition.
“OMA has the ability to think along
new lines and we find the prospect of
co-operation very exciting. Situated
alongside a museum and a cinema, the
library will be a central element on the
Oslo West site. Constructed on just a
few levels, the building will be light and
airy and offer easy access to the public.
By reason of its situation, the library
will serve to connect three central city
areas; the Aker Brygge harbour development,
the City Hall Square and
the Vika shopping area. Consequently,
a large number of people will pass the
library throughout the day. Unfortunately
it is far too early in the planning
process to offer any details of the building.”
These visions represent a huge leap
when compared to Oslo’s main public
library of the present day. The Deichman
Library is housed in a venerable
but rundown and impractical building
from 1933. Its situation in Hammersborg,
a part of the city that attracts few
people apart from those who work
there, is also a disadvantage. Seated in a
cramped office in this somewhat inaccessible
building, Igal Voronel works on
the plans for the new library. A social
anthropologist by profession, he has
specialised in organisational learning.
He has also worked as an IT-consultant
in the advertising business. Coming
initially to the Deichman Library in
connection with a project to develop a
model for school libraries, he was later
asked to take over the project for the
new Oslo library.
“It is easier for me as an outsider to ask
questions.Within all professional environments
shared knowledge is often
taken for granted, whereas I can ask
questions about things which members
of staff accept without thinking. This
seems to me important in the process
towards a new library,” explains Igal
Voronel. He uses words and expressions
not typical of the library sector.
“We carry out a kind of business management
practice also in libraries,
when we create a set of connected services.
I feel that all the various components
which go to make up a library
must be organised into a system and
that we should think more in the form
of concepts rather than specific professional
areas.We must consider the library in
the light of what is happening
elsewhere in society. If a new school reform
takes place, this will have an effect
on library services. If unemployment
rises, the library sector will need to
think along new lines.”
Visions
The public library is an institution with
long traditions. Is the desire for change
perhaps not always so great?
“We must start by asking for a definition
of the library of today. Many people
will answer that a library is a large
space with books, computers and access
to the Internet. In that case we
must ask ourselves if such a description
corresponds to our view of the role of
the library. If the answer is yes, then
our aim should be to build an even
larger space with room for ten times as
many books and computers – a sort of
free Amazon.com.
However, that is not our aim. A new
library should concern itself with all
those aspects offering stimulation and
new experiences.We should make
available the tools that make it possible
for people to meet, to work together
and to share a common activity. Our
starting point should not be the information
itself, but those people who will
be making use of the information.
A library should not function like a
telephone directory with numbers and
letters waiting to be looked up. Numbers
and letters as such are not knowledge.
They need to be processed in order
to become knowledge. The aim of
libraries must be to give their users the
ability to navigate their way through
the information jungle. We must stimulate
users to make their own connections,
to find their own path to
knowledge.”
Igal Voronel regards the library as a social
arena rather than a place for the
individual.
“We like to say that reading is an individual
experience, but it is the discussion
of literature which makes it part of
a culture. Libraries provide a natural
arena for the exchange of literary views
and impressions. The new library
should be a meeting place, a workplace,
an arena of learning and a centre for
cultural activities.Within these areas
there will be a wide variety of services
but in order to provide some fixed
points, I should like to concentrate on
four characteristics or measurements of
effect.”
Secular or sacred?
Libraries have often been regarded as
rather exalted institutions and this is
clearly apparent in the Deichman
Library building at Hammersborg. It
stands there like a temple, securely placed
between two churches. Igal Voronel’s
description of the future new
library offers a completely different
starting point.
“The library should be as secular as
possible and in close contact with
everyday life. It should reflect society
and function on society’s terms. Since
we live in a technological age, the library
also must be a child of technology,”
claims the project leader.
However, the library is not granted this
position by right. It must market itself
in the same way as any other player in
society.
“If we wish the library to retain an
exalted position as a kind of temple,
then there is no need for marketing,
since everybody knows where the
temple is. If on the other hand we
prefer to see the library as an active
part of so-ciety, then it becomes simply
one alternative among many and we
must shout in order to be heard. In
today’s information society it is extremely
important to be visible.
Therefore we intend to pay a great
deal of attention to marketing strategies.
We must define the image we wish
to present and build further on this. If
you were to ask each individual librarian
in Norway to name the five most
important elements in creating a good
image, very few would be able to give
an immediate answer.We have commenced
an internal process here with a
view to finding precisely that answer.”
The new library will come to play a
role different to that of today.What
about the librarians? Will they also
need to make changes?
“There is no doubt whatsoever that the
new library will require a change in the
role of its librarians. IT-skills will become
even more important, since most
activities will be computer-supported
in some way or other. Keeping up-todate
in this field will therefore be a significant
part of the job. In addition
librarians will assume a wider pedagogic
role in offering guidance and in
adapting themselves to meet the various
needs of users. They will not engage
in teaching but will aim to stimulate
users to study for themselves. This
is a demanding role, placing the librarian
in the limelight all the time.
In a dynamic library the functions of
librarians will be in constant change
and this opens the way for other professions
to enter the library sector.
Today we have members of staff here
known as ‘library executives’. Their
common characteristic is that they are
not trained librarians but are qualified
in other academic fields such as languages
or the history of literature. It is
precisely the interdisciplinary element
they represent which is exciting and
which brings a new dynamic to library
staff.”
Is it easy to obtain support for the new
library among those members of staff
who have worked at the Deichman
Library for many years.
“I have the impression that the majority
are very enthusiastic and are looking
forward to moving into the new building.
A large number of the present
staff are between 50 and 60 years old,
which means that many will be retiring
during the course of the next few years.
We can therefore expect to see a new
generation of younger librarians already
attuned to rapid change. Nowadays
very few people regard their place of
work as permanent for life and we
should be able to attract staff looking
for a new working environment.”
Voronel also hopes that the public will
be able to have some influence on the
kind of library they would like to see,
but so far little progress has been made
in this direction.
“Identifying the needs of users by
means of questionnaires and surveys
represents a dilemma.When asked
what they want, they often show a preference
for more of what they know,
simply because they find it difficult to
imagine anything not already in
existence. They ask for yet more books
and yet more personal computers.We
therefore intend to wait until we are
further ahead in our plans before approaching
the public on a wider scale.”
Considering the rapid changes in
today’s society, is there a risk that the
library you are planning now will
already be out-of-date by 2011?
“That is precisely why it is so important
to think more about infrastructure
and systems than about the contents of
the library.We must create a basis for
services, but always retain the possibility
of reassessment. A five-year plan is
out of the question. Like any other business,
we must be able to adapt rapidly.
We are a service organisation and
being able to respond to the market is
vital. The principles of ‘free libraries’
and ‘democratisation’ have long been
gospel in the library sector, whereas
‘marketing’ has been considered a dirty
word. It is easy to forget that people
who use libraries are in fact customers.
There is no such thing as free library
services, since all users are tax-payers
and have a right to get something in
return for their money. The relationship
between a library and those who
use its services is no more than a normal
customer/supplier situation, which
is why libraries should pay greater
attention to the customer experience.”
Will the new library concentrate on
special target groups?
“Differentiating between types of users
goes against the principle that libraries
are for everybody. A library should be
available to everyone but we cannot do
everything for everybody. We are
obliged to differentiate between target
groups and services in relation to use
and we must consider where we should
like to see changes. The fact that 50 per
cent of the population makes use of the
public library system is regarded as positive.
In reality, however, this is a low
figure, indicating only that the remaining
50 per cent prefer some other
supplier. We cannot be satisfied with
that.”
Translated by Eric Deverill