Manuel Castells, professor in sociology
at the University of California, Berkeley,
has written a fundamental analysis
of the global information society in his
book The Information Age. A few years
ago Pekka Himanen, PhD wrote a book
called The Hacker Ethics and the Spirit
of the Information Age, translated into
around a dozen languages. In The Finnish
Model of the Information Society,
published in the report series of SITRA
in Finland in 2001, these two authors,
Castells and Himanen, compare and
analyse three kinds of information
society – Singapore, Silicon Valley and
Finland.
The comparison includes factors like
technology – infrastructure, production
and knowledge, economy – competitiveness,
productivity, innovation and
GNP, welfare – education, well-being
and health, and openness – politics, the
civic society and globalisation. According
to this report, what is particular to
the Finnish model is an aspiration to
combine a dynamic technological and
economic thinking with the use of new
technology in order to promote social
equality and general prosperity.
Contrary to the p revailing global trend,
where the developing information society
excludes a great many people,
Finnish strategies for building the information
society really equate with
the goals for a welfare society. The national
strategy is focused on welfare and
equality, as well as on technological development
and competitiveness.
The Finnish Library Policy Programme
for 2001-2004 is based on the
thoroughly revised Library Act of 1998,
and on the Finnish Government Programme,
in which libraries are referred
to as the crucial pillar in the provision
of educational and cultural services.
The Programme is also built on the
high lending and visiting figures, the
co-operative abilities and the technological
prowess of Finnish libraries.
That citizens shall have access to knowledge
and culture, regardless of their
financial circumstances or where they
live, is seen as a valuable basic right.
More than 70% of Finnish libraries
belong to some regional library network.
Collaboration with scientific and
polytechnic libraries is on the increase,
and often this takes the form of joint
virtual libraries. In the Library Policy
Programme the national library net is
seen as a whole, whereas, in reality, different
kinds of libraries are split up
within the state administration.
As part of its cultural strategy, the Ministry
of Education is now preparing a
national library strategy extending to
2010. Vital goals include: a smooth
state library administration with a
functional national library net, development
of hybrid libraries, ensuring
geographical and social equality with
respect to accessibility of library and
information services and access to information.
Information and knowledge have a
market value, of course, and interest is
growing – not only in the private sector
– in making economic use of information
produced with public funds. The
European Commission’s Green Paper
on the use of public sector information
in the information society (KOM
1998/585) brings up the issue from the
market’s point of view – information
can be classified according to its market
value.Within the GATT negotiations
something called “liberalisation of
libraries” has been raised.
It’s high time to start pondering what
kind of information is so essential to
an open society, civic rights, democratic
values and promoting general welfare,
that it should be freely available to
all, regardless of whether it is so-called
“born digital” or whether it is, for instance,
parts of our cultural heritage
that have been digitised.
There are no free lunches; someone
always has to pay. We need to look at
the information society’s great ‘smorgasbord’,
and consider which dishes
should be available free, which with
subsidised luncheon vouchers, and
which at full cost.
In this year’s first issue of SPLQ Jens
Thorhauge, Director of the Danish National
Library Authority, wants to
promote a dialogue on current issues.
Among other things he asks if “the exploding
use of the Internet should lead
to a kind of public service thinking”, as
we have in state-produced television
and radio. Certainly we should also
discuss accessibility and supply of information
in relation to certain fundamental
and shared values – in relation
to promoting social equality and welfare.
Which values are shared and indispensable
in a Nordic – or European –
context? What kind of information is
related to these values?
Translated by Britt & Philip Gaut