DEF’s aim it to ensure that researchers,
students, trade and industry and other
users of the research libraries gain
quicker, easier and more effective access
to topical and relevant research results
of high quality via the virtual library,
independent of time, place and
where the information resources may
actually be placed. The DEF vision is
based on the following principles:
- a single point of access
- unified login (including one user ID)
- one common user interface, i.e. one
presentation structure
- one uniform,user-friendly retrieval
system
- direct access to electronic media and
a unified request service.
The Danish solution is unique in its
ambition to create one common, electronic,
national, coherent, electronic
research library which in time will include
every single research library in
Denmark.DEF does therefore not only
underline the financial, but also the cooperative
and organisational frames for
DEF as a network organisation for the
project’s players,the participating
research libraries which are each of
them responsible for IT upgrading and
implementation locally.
At the moment 31 research libraries are
taking part in the work on deff.dk –
the DEF portal. 122 research libraries
have already had or are in the process
of getting their library systems upgraded
via DEF, 96 libraries (sites) covering
a further 194 institutes/institutions/
hospitals participate in the license
work, 14 research libraries are co-operating
on the retro-conversion of catalogue
cards. Apart from this, 35 research
libraries are participating in the
20 DEF development projects which
i.a. include user training, competence
development, user surveys/satisfaction,
digitisation, technology-supported
teaching and web archiving. The public
libraries have one representative in the
DEF Steering Committee as well and in
the DEF license group and also participate
in the DEF co-operation in two of
the 20 DEF development projects.
The vision
The DEF-vision is based on the idea of
a common platform which gives the
individual library the possibility o f offering
access to an extended mass of information
resources, primarily electronic
periodicals and databases through
the signing of national licence agreements
which are financially advantageous
to the libraries. And – as we have
seen – the chance to provide the users
with access to a wider selection of information
resources.
The vision also includes new services,
based on individual user profiles and
the development of intelligent agents
and software which might for example
be able to analyse user behaviour patterns
on the basis of user profiles and
similar parameters. A very important
action line indeed, seen in the light of
the change of paradigm in the role of
the libraries; because of the increased
volume of information made available
to the individual user, the role of the libraries
as mediators of knowledge
takes on an increasing significance.
The establishment of DEF has in practice
been based on four main action
lines:
- National infrastructure – building a
common portal as single point access
to the electronic resources, catalogues
and subject gateways and to Danish
research information as well as
consensus on the use of standards,
user administration etc.
- Library infrastructure – upgrading of
IT systems as well as standardisation
of library systems, co-ordination and
co-operation
- Digital resources – license agreements
at national level, digitisation
of collections and retro-conversion
of catalogue cards
- User facilities – development projects,
i.a. including user training,
competence development, user surveys
and user satisfaction, digitisation
and technology-supported learning
(e-learning),e-publishing.
The portal
The first version of the portal for Denmark’s
Electronic Research Library
‘deff.dk’ went on the air in autumn
2001. Up until the end of the project
period in 2002, ‘deff.dk’ will be currently
developed with new functions,
services and adjustments. At this moment
the portal offers online access to:
- About 400 electronic net resources
(catalogues and information databases)
- An overview of 7,000 journal titles
and searches on titles in b road subject
categories
- Cross searches in the participating
research libraries’ catalogues and
webpages
- Ordering from the public and the
research libraries’ catalogues via
library.dk
- Five subject portals (within music,
clinical information, energy, foodstuffs
and nutrition, business economics)
- Searching within 26 subject areas
with links to Danish and foreign
webpages, portals, databases etc.
- A guided tour of the portal.
As a joint entrance to Denmark’s Electronic
Research Library, deff.dk offers
access to a number of information resources,
selected on the basis of demands
for quality and relevance.
deff.dk sorts through knowledge and
gives the user access to quality resources
across the libraries, whatever the
physical location of the collections.
Denmark’s Electronic Research Library
is an ‘open’ development project and
the portal is constantly being developed
and extended. In the spring of 2002
‘the key’ will be implemented and the
vision of the electronic research library
will have been optimised with a 24-
hour access to quality-assured information
with up-to-date support facilities
and tools.
Future perspectives
In January 2002 the DEF project entered
its final phase, and plans for the
future organisation of ‘DEF after DEF’
are still on the drawing board.
The vision of Denmark’s Electronic
Research Library is,however, already
now a fact and has brought influence
to bear on each and every research library
in Denmark, on the service profile
in relation to the users’ altered needs
and demands, co-operative relations
both within and across the library and
research sector and not least on publishing
structure, registration and marketing
of research results.
Denmark’s Electronic Research Library
helps to focus the attention on the
number of changes of paradigm which
take place in the digital library, the
most important of these being related
to the purchase of licenses for electronic
information.
Acquisition of journals
– a change of paradigm in practice
One of the DEF project’s most important
action lines has to do with national
license agreements for electronic
journals.DEF co-operation on licenses
is an example of a model for how Danish
research libraries – in co-operation
with public libraries and other institutions
– handle the change of paradigm
from traditional collection building
to online access to resources in
relation to journals.
Development of the information technology
has been all-important, not
only as regards the contents of the libraries’
collections, but also in terms of
the actual building up of these. The
considerable expansion of the Internet
has now made it necessary to look at
electronic publishing from a fresh
point of view. Access to electronic information
has for example become a
marked requirement by the users, resulting
in forcing suppliers and publishers/
agents to develop new publishing
methods as well as new price structures.
Consequently the libraries have
entered into consortia in order to provide
access to the considerable wealth
of data in the most resource-saving
way. The transition to electronic information
dissemination has made it
necessary for the libraries to change internal
routines and work processes.
One primary objective of Denmark’s
Electronic Research Library has thus
been to be instrumental in highlighting
and developing the change which is
going on in the libraries’ acquisition
policy, economy and procedures in
connection with this transition.
Traditional collection building
Over the years the libraries have spent
many resources on choosing and making
available printed journals. Suggestions
for the purchase of various titles
would as a rule come from researchers,
users and research librarians, a sample
copy might then be ordered and subsequently
the decision was made. Price,
subject area and estimated use would
all be factors to be taken into consideration.
Following a purchase, the journals
would be catalogued, single copies
registered in cardex, paid for, claimed
etc. At regular intervals they would go
through their collections to identify the
journals which were not being used
and then possibly cancel them. Articles
from journals which were not held by
the library in question, could be acquired
via interlibrary loan/document delivery.
The journals crisis
At the beginning of the 90s the price of
journals, especially foreign journals,
absolutely exploded. Annual price increases
were close to 20% per year. In
order to keep within their budgets, the
libraries had to cancel a large number
of their journals. And apart from this
currencies fluctuated. From 1990-1995,
40% of the libraries had to cancel their
journals subscriptions.Within the
same period, the number of scientific
journals rose considerably, and researchers’
demands for access to scientific
literature did in no way subside.
Reorganisation
The need for a reorganisation of the libraries
was imminent, and when at this
point the first journals started to appear
in online versions, the way was
paved for electronic information. To
begin with electronic access was free,if
the library subscribed to the printed
version. This meant that the lib raries
did not immediately gain access to new
material (i.e. other than they already
had access to).
The forming of consortia slowly began
to take shape in order to provide access
to more journals. The first consortium
for licensing journals evolved in 1997/
98 in the very early stages of the DEF
project. The first agreement was on
Chemical Abstracts and the second was
with Academic Press. This initial consortium
consisted of the State and University
Library, Aalborg University Library,
the Technical Knowledge Centre
of Denmark and Lund University Library
in Sweden. The participating
libraries gained access to all journals
(175) published by Academic Press,
and the price for this access was calculated
on the basis of what each library
possessed in the way of printed editions
in the year of acquisition. You not
only gained electronic access to the library’s
printed editions, but also to
journals which has been cancelled during
the early 1990s. The participants
also gained access to a number of journals
which they would never themselves
have bought.
The electronic journals were catalogued,
and sometimes individual copies
were registered in cardex. The libraries
worked out alphabetical lists on the
web pages which would point the users
in the direction of the journal’s homepage.
At first both the p rinted and the electronic
version was made available to
the end users, but eventually the libra-
ries found it necessary to cut down on
expenses, choosing to cancel the printed
edition and making only the electronic
version available. Many questions
did of course present themselves
prior to such cancellations – when to
give up the printed edition – questions
which are still being debated at the
moment for example in relation to
when the electronic edition would be
available (before/after or at the same
time as the printed version), whether
the content was the same, whether you
could be sure that the journal was
always available, whether the library
would be allowed to say no to access to
titles which it was not interested in and
how the library could make the end
users aware of the fact that the journal
was available in electronic form?
The transition of a library service from
printed to electronic information is a
lengthy process. It is not enough to get
access to the electronic information,it
also has to be made available to the end
users and in a way which is satisfactory
to everyone. The Technical Knowledge
Centre of Denmark, with financial support
from Denmark’s Electronic Research
Library, developed an interface
which could be used for searching in
journals, across titles and across publishers.
At the same time, the publishers
also realised the necessity of creating
interfaces, and by degrees the market
has experienced a vast number of gateways
which are very different in content
as well as principle of operation.
Consortia
The libraries are not alone in seeing the
transition as a lengthy process, the same
applies to the publishers. To begin
with it was the big journals publishers
– Academic Press, Elsevier, Kluwer –
who brought forward the consortia
models. Smaller publishers were to follow
and gradually societies have joined
in. The critical mass has been reached,
but there is still a large number of
journals only available in printed form.
The consortia models have from the
word go been a package deal. If enough
libraries wanted to join, everyone
gained access. The accession policy disappeared
from the libraries and day-today
work in the library consequently
changed. There is no registration of
journal issues with ele ctronic access
anymore, on the other hand staff for
teaching and marketing of these new
resources is in great demand.
Electronic journals have also altered
the way in which to search on the net.
Today researchers use a much greater
variety of journals than before, because
of the opportunities open to them –
and the number of journals published
is forever increasing. Last, but not least,
the form of publishing is changing.
The number of scientific journals is
still rising, but researchers are aware of
the new possibilities of publishing
which the net offers, so more changes
are in the offing.
Conclusion
The change of paradigm from collection
building to online access has meant
that libraries are still facing many unanswered
questions. Questions which
they must find the answers to in cooperation
with DEF. As to access, one
can nevertheless say that electronic information
is available 365 days a year,
round the clock, and from the researcher’s
own writing desk as well. It is
also up the user her/himself which
journals they want to apply their searches
to.
The libraries worry about the rapidly
changing situation and about how they
are going to solve the problems which
crop up. In order to secure the information
for their users, they will therefore
continue to build consortia. They
try to solve the problems of accession
and archiving and are looking out for
new opportunities.
The role of the libraries has changed,
but there is no doubt that they are still
playing a decisive role in the dissemination
of knowledge and the development/
building up of Danish knowledge
infrastructure and research.
Conclusion
Denmark’s Electronic Research Library
helps to highlight the dimensions and
consequences which the expansion of
the Internet has meant to the new behaviour
pattern of the user and the
application of electronic information.
Access to electronic information will in
future become an expressive demand
from the user with the result that publishers
and information agents, like the
libraries, will have to develop their
electronic services and mediation in a
way which will continue to contribute
towards the free and democratic access
to information, wherever it is to be
found all over the world or whichever
server it might be available on. The
virtual library consortia will remove or
dissolve borders on many levels – also
those between public and research
libraries.
Translated by Vibeke Cranfield